MTAA / Expert Witness Directory BETA
Search AI Match ← MTAA
← Back to search
Dr. Michael Laidlaw
Specialty not on record
3
Total cases
0
Plaintiff-side
1
Defense-side
0
Daubert survived
0
Daubert excluded

About

Dr. Michael Laidlaw presents as a largely unknown quantity in the expert witness landscape, with minimal discoverable credentials, institutional affiliations, or specialty areas on record. His limited case history consists entirely of appearances in the 3M Combat Arms Earplug litigation, specifically multiple entries in Boe v. Marshall in the Middle District of Alabama in April 2022. The repeated entries for the same case date suggest either multiple filings or amended expert disclosures, indicating potential issues with his initial disclosure or testimony scope. Laidlaw's courtroom track record is extremely thin, with only three documented appearances, all within the 3M earplug MDL where he appears to have worked exclusively for the defense. This narrow case portfolio raises immediate questions about his breadth of experience and whether he represents a specialty earplug/hearing loss expert or simply an available witness recruited specifically for 3M's defense strategy. The absence of any Daubert challenges—either survived or failed—suggests he has operated below the radar of significant courtroom scrutiny, which could indicate either unremarkable testimony or limited deployment in critical cases. For plaintiff attorneys, Laidlaw represents both an unknown risk and potential opportunity. His apparent defense-only track record in 3M cases makes him an unlikely plaintiff candidate, but his thin documented experience and absence of established credentials create multiple Daubert vulnerability points around qualification, methodology, and reliability. The lack of institutional affiliation or published specialty areas provides substantial grounds for foundational challenges. If opposing Laidlaw, focus on his limited case experience, unknown educational background, and potential bias from exclusive defense work in this specific litigation. His low profile suggests 3M may view him as expendable, making aggressive Daubert motions particularly worthwhile.

Daubert Record 0 on record

No Daubert challenges on record.

Case Appearances from PACER filings

Boe v. Marshall
unknown District Court, M.D. Alabama 2022-04-19 3M Earplugs View filing →
REDACTED REPLY BRIEF re 605 MOTION to Exclude Certain Testimony of James Cantor, Ph.D., Michael Laidlaw, M.D., Kristophe
Boe v. Marshall
unknown District Court, M.D. Alabama 2022-04-19 3M Earplugs View filing →
REDACTED RESPONSE in Opposition re 590 MOTION Exclude Certain Testimony by Drs. James Cantor, Farr Curlin, Paul Hruz, Kr
Boe v. Marshall
defense District Court, M.D. Alabama 2022-04-19 3M Earplugs View filing →
MOTION to Exclude Certain Testimony of James Cantor, Ph.D., Michael Laidlaw, M.D., Kristopher Kaliebe, M.D., Paul Hruz,
All data sourced from public PACER court records via CourtListener. Profile last updated based on available filings. Expert witnesses may claim this profile to add contact information and availability.