MTAA / Expert Witness Directory BETA
Search AI Match ← MTAA
← Back to search
Unknown Expert Witness
Specialty not on record · CO
7
Total cases
0
Plaintiff-side
7
Defense-side
0
Daubert survived
0
Daubert excluded

About

This expert witness remains largely unidentified with no publicly available credentials, institutional affiliation, or verified area of expertise on record. The lack of basic professional information raises immediate red flags about transparency and credibility. All available case history traces to a single matter - United States v. Schmidt in the District Court of Colorado in March 2004 - where this expert appeared three times for the defense, suggesting either multiple depositions, testimony phases, or related proceedings within the same criminal case. Without access to the underlying case materials, the specific nature of their expertise and testimony methodology remains unknown. The expert's courtroom track record shows exclusive defense-side alignment (3/3 cases) within what appears to be federal criminal proceedings rather than mass tort litigation. This limited case history - all stemming from a single 2004 matter - provides insufficient data to assess their reliability, testimony quality, or effectiveness under cross-examination. The absence of any Daubert challenges may reflect either the limited scope of their testimony or the fact that criminal proceedings often have different evidentiary standards than civil mass tort cases. For plaintiff attorneys, this expert presents significant strategic concerns due to the complete lack of verifiable credentials and minimal litigation footprint. The 20-year gap since their last recorded testimony, combined with unknown qualifications and methodology, creates substantial Daubert vulnerabilities if they attempt to testify in mass tort proceedings. Plaintiff counsel should demand comprehensive CV disclosure, publication records, and detailed methodology before engaging this expert. If opposing this witness, focus Daubert challenges on lack of qualifications, absence of peer-reviewed work, and potential unreliability of opinions from an expert who cannot demonstrate current expertise or recognized standing in their purported field.

Daubert Record 0 on record

No Daubert challenges on record.

Case Appearances from PACER filings

United States v. Fuechtener
defense District Court, D. Nevada 2016-03-30 View filing →
MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Defendant's Expert Witness by USA as to Jan Rouven Fuechtener. Responses due by 7/29/
United States v. Schmidt
defense District Court, D. Colorado 2004-03-10 View filing →
STATEMENT Proffer of Expert Witness Testimony by Defendant George Alan Weed (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Expert Witness cur
United States v. Schmidt
defense District Court, D. Colorado 2004-03-10 View filing →
STATEMENT Proffer of Expert Witness Testimony by Defendant George Alan Weed (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Expert Witness cur
United States v. Schmidt
defense District Court, D. Colorado 2004-03-10 View filing →
STATEMENT Proffer of Expert Witness Testimony by Defendant George Alan Weed (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Expert Witness cur
United States v. Schmidt
defense District Court, D. Colorado 2004-03-10 View filing →
STATEMENT Proffer of Expert Witness Testimony by Defendant George Alan Weed (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Expert Witness cur
United States v. Schmidt
defense District Court, D. Colorado 2004-03-10 View filing →
STATEMENT Proffer of Expert Witness Testimony by Defendant George Alan Weed (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Expert Witness cur
United States v. Schmidt
defense District Court, D. Colorado 2004-03-10 View filing →
STATEMENT Proffer of Expert Witness Testimony by Defendant George Alan Weed (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Expert Witness cur
All data sourced from public PACER court records via CourtListener. Profile last updated based on available filings. Expert witnesses may claim this profile to add contact information and availability.