MTAA / Expert Witness Directory BETA
Search AI Match ← MTAA
← Back to search
Glave
Specialty not on record
2
Total cases
2
Plaintiff-side
0
Defense-side
0
Daubert survived
0
Daubert excluded

About

**EXPERT INTELLIGENCE PROFILE: GLAVE** Glave remains a largely opaque expert witness with minimal discoverable credentials, institutional affiliations, or specialty area on public record. The available case history shows exclusive involvement in United States v. STERLINGOV, a federal criminal matter in D.C. District Court from June 2021, appearing twice on the plaintiff side in what appears to be the same underlying case. Without accessible CV, academic appointments, or professional background, Glave's methodology, qualifications, and area of expertise cannot be independently verified through standard channels. This lack of transparency regarding credentials represents a significant intelligence gap that should raise immediate due diligence concerns. The courtroom track record shows 100% plaintiff-side alignment across the limited two-case sample, both tied to the STERLINGOV federal prosecution. However, this pattern emerges from a single case matter rather than demonstrating broader litigation experience. Notably, no Daubert challenges appear on record, though this likely reflects the federal criminal context rather than the expert's reliability in civil tort litigation where admissibility standards may be more rigorously contested. For plaintiff attorneys, Glave presents substantial strategic risks due to the complete absence of verifiable credentials and unknown specialty area. Without established expertise, published methodology, or institutional backing, this expert would face immediate and likely successful Daubert challenges in any serious mass tort litigation. The lack of discoverable background makes it impossible to assess relevant qualifications for specific tort claims or predict courtroom performance under cross-examination. Plaintiff counsel should avoid retention until comprehensive credential verification is completed. For opposing counsel, Glave represents a high-value target for exclusion motions based on foundational qualification challenges under Daubert's reliability requirements.

Daubert Record 0 on record

No Daubert challenges on record.

Case Appearances from PACER filings

United States v. STERLINGOV
plaintiff District Court, District of Columbia 2021-06-14 View filing →
NOTICE (SUPPLEMENTAL) OF INTENT TO PRESENT EXPERT TESTIMONY by USA as to ROMAN STERLINGOV re 61 Notice (Other) (Attachme
United States v. STERLINGOV
plaintiff District Court, District of Columbia 2021-06-14 View filing →
NOTICE (SUPPLEMENTAL) OF INTENT TO PRESENT EXPERT TESTIMONY by USA as to ROMAN STERLINGOV re 61 Notice (Other) (Attachme
All data sourced from public PACER court records via CourtListener. Profile last updated based on available filings. Expert witnesses may claim this profile to add contact information and availability.